![]() To shed light on this still unclear conceptual outline, this article divides the soft planning debate into five contextual components (ethos governance politics policies spaces and scale) while paying particular attention to the relationship between soft planning and strategic spatial planning. Such diversity fuels long-standing questions about what can or cannot be considered as soft planning as well as about its usefulness for today's planning theory and practice. ![]() However, as soft planning-related literature proliferates, so does the diversity of approaches and planning practices it encompasses. Since the term soft spaces was firstly coined, soft planning has been used to describe a growing number of practices that occur at the margins of statutory planning systems. Over the last decade, soft planning has become an increasingly visible concept in planning literature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |